About asylum seekers and the route of least resistance in the face of the suspension of Schengen

This morning I read this article from Dutch newspaper Trouw, entitled (translated) “The new route to Europe leads to Finland through Russia.”

First digression – did you know there is an European Asylum Support Office, and that it was led by a Dutch person (Robert Visser), whose five-year term is just over? Well, neither did I.

The second paragraph of the article reads (my translation):

“They arrive at the very Northernmost tip of Finland. That was not foreseen in any scenario. They all come via Russia. This is yet another indication that these movements are largely organized. You do not invent by yourself, if you are in the Middle east: I’m going to northern Russia and cross the border there. ”
The latest figures from the EU statistics agency Eurostat indeed show a huge increase in the number of asylum seekers in Finland. In January the figure was 305. In August 2890 arrived, followed by no less than 10 815 in September. Most of them (9090) were Iraqis. According to Visser  there is a ‘reasoned expectation ” that this trend continues.”

I am not concerned here with what the Finnish government did or did not say about the expected numbers; that is a matter of domestic politics (and also the reasons why Iraqis are coming). Rather, I want to draw attention to that map of Europe.

Apparently the goal of many asylum seekers is to arrive eventually in Germany – probably regarding the economic situation there or the relatively welcoming stance of the country.

Remember that a while ago some countries “temporarily” suspended the Schengen agreement? Well, look at those borders again. How many borders do you have to cross supposing Schengen is in force still, if you arrive in e.g. Italy or Greece and you want to go to Germany? Right, only the first border. Now the situation is different with Austria building fences and Slovenia in and Hungary fenced off. Look at this graph from the NY Times, which is already out of date of course.

So in a short time the numbers of borders that have to be crossed increased, and at each border the asylum seekers experience hardship. So look at that map again – if you leave from Northern Iraq or Syria through Turkey and then cross the borders in Georgia and Russia (or by boat straight from Turkey to Russia), then the route through Russia to Europe is entirely logical to end in Finland, especially given the attitudes of Eastern European countries towards asylum seekers.

I guess my broader point is that (obviously) shutting the borders doesn’t make the problem go away. It just forces the streams to find a less interrupted route. The point Visser makes about the “organized” nature of asylum seeker flows is important, but in my opinion flawed – it just takes information about the state of the borders and what obstacles asylum seekers may face. They will find their way – the example of biking across the border is instructive in this sense. They use information about the rules to their advantage.

In the context of this all, I would like to add that bombing traffickers is not the solution. The asylum seekers from Syria and Iraq leave because it is not safe there. They can come entirely over land if they wish – for instance to Finland.

Regarding reactions: this is a potential foreign policy issue for Finland regarding Russia. And no, building a fence is unlikely to succeed.

Advertisements

6 responses to “About asylum seekers and the route of least resistance in the face of the suspension of Schengen

  1. Pingback: Is Finnish foreign policy on Russia in for a change? | Arjen polku

  2. No wonder we have never heard about this organisation, because it doesn’t know facts. I don’t know if you have heard, but people really come into Finland from northern tip of Finland. Only problem is that Russian borders keeps pretty well, but Swedish ain’t.

    “Hakijareitti on kulkenut pääasiassa Tornion kautta, ja kun järjestelykeskus avattiin, tulijoiden määrät alenivat.” http://www.ts.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/825262/Turvapaikanhakijoiden+maaran+lasku+voi+olla+hetkellista

    Many of them ain’t even be asylum seekers, but adventures. http://www.iltasanomat.fi/kotimaa/art-1446151408529.html

    Routa porsaan kotiin ajaa, if you didn’t really have any reason to come here. Only most tenacious “immigrants” and real asylum seekers stay.

    Asylum seekers have been bicycling into Norway, not in Finland and Norway is gonna do something for this and there’s some other solutions coming also. http://www.thelocal.no/20151008/norway-brings-in-tough-five-year-asylum-limit

    You gotta fight Isis off and create future for youngsters. Things ain’t gonna work out if we get all pussies here in Finland, who ain’t wanna create better country for themself and their children. Many of guys who come here might even be from Saddam Hussein regime and now they ain’t get no positions in new Iraq. Many of them might have done some nasty things.

    I wanna create Finland, which is more like Switzerland, not any god damn pussystate, where people just follow leaders and are like lambs. Strong leader have made people so, that they can’t rule themself, even Macchiavelli said this few hundred years ago.

    It’s important to think if these people who ain’t really asylum seekers make Finland stronger or weaker. In United States these immigrants can work for their living as servants, but in Finland this ain’t gonna work, cause we aint wanna create a class who are modern slaves.

    I could almost bet, that in 20 years Sweden will have a lot of problems, cause they can’t implement this many refugees and they are gonna create own cultures, which is based in some 1500 years old things and which doesn’t work no more. Some cultures would need some update and that’s one reason why they are falling. You gotta keep up in evolution or evolution will swallow you.

    • Yes, this is why I wrote this post. We hear about Tornio and that people amounts are declining. I don’t have an explanation for the statements of that director. They seem odd in the light of what we read and experience in Finland.
      I think you make some corners straight regarding immigration, but there has to be some feasible plan indeed. The worst thing, in particular also for asylum seekers, is that they are unemployed and not anywhere near the job market.

      Thanks for your comment!

  3. Pingback: Asylum seekers ARE coming through Russia to Finland. Now we see the failure of individual countries closing borders. | Arjen polku

  4. Pingback: Turvapaikanhakijat saapuvat Venäjältä Suomeen, niin kuin EASO ennusti | Arjen polku

  5. Pingback: Lyhyesti Lapin rajasta taas: I told you so! | Arjen polku

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s